Colorado’s “Express Consent” law provides that anyone driving a vehicle in Colorado consents to the various provisions of 42-4-1301.1. Essentially, the driver has agreed to cooperate in, and complete, the testing of the person’s breath or blood for alcohol, whenever it is requested by an officer having probable cause to believe the person was driving while intoxicated.
The driver will have three choices: breath, blood, or to refuse testing altogether. If the driver chooses one method of testing and that method is unavailable, the police may ask him to perform a different chemical test if there are “extraordinary circumstances” which would prevent the driver from completing his chosen method of testing within two hours of driving.
A person who is dead or unconscious, and thus unable to verbally consent to a test of any kind, will receive a blood test if suspected of DUI.
While the Express Consent statute does hold that all Colorado drivers have essentially consented to a chemical test by the fact of their driving, the Colorado Supreme Court recently held that a conscious driver can revoke this statutory consent to a blood draw. Once consent has been revoked, the police are required to obtain a warrant before trying to conduct a blood draw. Otherwise, any evidence obtained from the blood draw should be excluded from trial unless one of the recognized exceptions to the exclusionary rule applies.
A warrant cannot be obtained for a blood draw in an ordinary DUI. Â This is only something that can happen in a more serious case – such as cases where the offenses of vehicular homicide and vehicular assault are suspected.
If you refuse to take a chemical test, that refusal may be admitted into evidence against you at any trial in your case, and the jury may use that evidence for any purpose.
If you have been charged with a DUI and are looking for representation call Kimberly now at (720) 257-5346 for a FREE 45 minute consultation.
Missing a Colorado sex offender registration deadline can expose you to a separate criminal charge. A short delay is not automatically excused, and registering late does not necessarily erase the missed deadline. At the same time, missing a deadline is not the same as a conviction. The prosecution generally must prove a knowing failure to comply, and the exact notice, deadline, jurisdiction, and surrounding facts can matter.
When a juvenile is arrested in Colorado, the child may be released to a parent or responsible adult, referred for detention screening, or held for a prompt detention hearing. If the child remains in custody, the hearing generally must occur within 48 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. The district attorney then decides whether to file a delinquency petition, offer diversion, or decline to prosecute formally. Decisions made during
Short answer: A Denver arrest does not automatically create a Colorado extreme risk protection order. However, allegations or evidence connected to the arrest can prompt an eligible person or agency to file a separate civil ERPO case. That case may move much faster than the criminal charge.
Police reports, witness accounts, alleged threats, statements about self-harm, and information about firearm access may all become relevant to an ERPO petition. The
